From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 2002
810 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D02-195.

February 6, 2002. Rehearing Denied March 28, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marc H. Gold, Judge.

Joe Washington, Marianna, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

SHAHOOD, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Washington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 2002
810 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOE WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 28, 2002

Citations

810 So. 2d 972 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)