Opinion
197 2022
09-06-2022
Submitted: July 22, 2022
Court Below-Superior Court of the State of Delaware Cr. ID No. 0909018475 (N)
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
GARY F. TRAYNOR, JUSTICE
After consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the appellee's motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's May 24, 2022 order. The Superior Court did not err in treating the appellant's motion to set aside judgment under Superior Court Civil Rules 55(c) and 60(b) as his third motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 and summarily dismissing that motion. The appellant did not plead with particularity new evidence of actual innocence or that a new, retroactive rule of constitutional law rendered his convictions invalid. Nor did he assert any claim that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction.
State v. Washington, 2022 WL 1656008 (Del. Super. Ct. May 24, 2022).
Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(2).
Del. Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(5).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.