Opinion
NO. 12-13-00345-CR NO. 12-13-00346-CR
02-12-2014
LAQUENTIN WASHINGTON, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
APPEAL FROM THE 241ST
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant, LaQuentin Washington, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk's record in these appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk's record filed due to appellant's fault). Appellant was notified on January 9, 2014, that the appeal would be presented to the court for dismissal unless, on or before January 21, 2014, proof of full payment to the clerk was provided to this court.
The January 21, 2014 deadline has now passed, and Appellant has neither provided proof of full payment nor otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
JUDGMENT
NO. 12-13-00345-CR
LAQUENTIN WASHINGTON,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
Appeal from the 241st District Court
of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 241-0592-13)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
JUDGMENT
NO. 12-13-00346-CR
LAQUENTIN WASHINGTON,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
Appeal from the 241st District Court
of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 241-0593-13)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of prosecution; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.