From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. C 10-05532 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 10-05532 SBA (PR)

11-18-2011

MARCUS WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent may have until January 13, 2012, in which to file an answer or other response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner may file a traverse to the answer within thirty days of his receipt of the answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong, Judge

United States District Court

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

That on November 18, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Marcus D. Washington G-00436

Folsom State Prison

P.O. Box 950

Folsom, CA 95763

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Washington v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2011
Case No. C 10-05532 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Washington v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 10-05532 SBA (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2011)