From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Hamilton

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 30, 2016
No. 19 MM 2016 (Pa. Mar. 30, 2016)

Opinion

No. 19 MM 2016

03-30-2016

SHERRILYN D. WASHINGTON, Respondent v. HARRY E. HAMILTON, Petitioner


ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Petitioner has 30 days from this order in which to submit his Petition for Allowance of Appeal.

To the extent Respondent's Answer seeks sanctions, it is DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Washington v. Hamilton

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 30, 2016
No. 19 MM 2016 (Pa. Mar. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Washington v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:SHERRILYN D. WASHINGTON, Respondent v. HARRY E. HAMILTON, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

No. 19 MM 2016 (Pa. Mar. 30, 2016)