From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 16, 2022
3:19-cv-00256-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2022)

Opinion

3:19-cv-00256-MMD-CSD

08-16-2022

MARCUS WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court is Petitioner Marcus Washington's Status Report Concerning Discovery. (ECF No. 95 (“Report”).) In his Report, Washington states that he is not pursuing any further discovery after his latest discovery efforts ended up fruitless. (Id. at 2.)

This Court previously postponed the deadline for filing an answer until after completion of discovery. (ECF No. 89.) Due to Washington's Report, this Court finds it necessary to reinstate the briefing schedule announced in its order granting Respondents' motion to dismiss, in part. (ECF No. 66.)

It is therefore ordered that, within 60 days of the date of entry of this order, Respondents must file an answer addressing all claims in the amended petition on the merits, under a de novo standard of review as to ground 3, and also addressing whether ground 3 is barred by procedural default under federal law.

It is further ordered that Washington will have 30 days from service of the answer within which to file a reply.


Summaries of

Washington v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 16, 2022
3:19-cv-00256-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Washington v. Gittere

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 16, 2022

Citations

3:19-cv-00256-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2022)