From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Franchise Tax Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 7, 2016
NO. EDCV 15-1254-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2016)

Opinion

NO. EDCV 15-1254-DSF (AGR)

06-07-2016

TONYA WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, et al., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is granted without leave to amend; (2) Plaintiff's demand for judgment as a matter of law is denied; and (3) Plaintiff's Demand for Mandamus or Alternative Rule Nisi Relief is denied as moot. DATED: 6/7/16

/s/_________

DALE S. FISCHER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Washington v. Franchise Tax Bd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 7, 2016
NO. EDCV 15-1254-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Washington v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Case Details

Full title:TONYA WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 7, 2016

Citations

NO. EDCV 15-1254-DSF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2016)