From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Edelen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Dec 9, 2020
Case No.: 4:20cv228-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 4:20cv228-MW/MAF

12-09-2020

MARLO WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER EDELEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 17. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,

Simultaneous with this Order, this Court is granting a fifth extension of time for a different pro se party to file objections in a different case. This Court is mindful of COVID-19 and the limitations the pandemic has placed on parties. Accordingly, parties may file one-page requests for extension for good cause—indeed, this Court receives and grants such requests daily. But Plaintiff did not request an extension to file objections here. --------

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order." The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on December 9, 2020.

s/ Mark E. Walker

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Washington v. Edelen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Dec 9, 2020
Case No.: 4:20cv228-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Washington v. Edelen

Case Details

Full title:MARLO WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER EDELEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 9, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 4:20cv228-MW/MAF (N.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 2020)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Cook

(Id. at 12). Plaintiff disclosed three cases: (1) Washington v. Norwood, No. 2:21cv14192 (S.D. Fla.); (2)…

Washington v. Cook

Upon investigation, the Court discovered Plaintiff's responses are false. Plaintiff did not disclose the…