From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Corrs. Officer Bregman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 1, 2024
3:20-cv-180-KAP (W.D. Pa. Apr. 1, 2024)

Opinion

3:20-cv-180-KAP

04-01-2024

ALVIN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN, Defendant


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge

The motion for sanctions at ECF no. 52 is denied. When I denied the motion for reconsideration at ECF no. 47 in February, see ECF no. 48, I stated “No more court time will be spent on this issue.” I meant that.

I also meant it when I stated “Plaintiff must file his pretrial statement on schedule.” Plaintiff is now a month overdue, and defendant has moved at ECF no. 49 to dismiss for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff shall file his pretrial statement forthwith, and on or before April 15, 2024 separately file a response to the motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

Washington v. Corrs. Officer Bregman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 1, 2024
3:20-cv-180-KAP (W.D. Pa. Apr. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Washington v. Corrs. Officer Bregman

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN WASHINGTON, Plaintiff v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 1, 2024

Citations

3:20-cv-180-KAP (W.D. Pa. Apr. 1, 2024)