From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Colgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 4, 2019
Civil Action No. 18 - 341 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 4, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 18 - 341

09-04-2019

JERMONE JUNIOR WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. C.O. COLGAN, MR. GILMORE, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, and STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim that was filed by Defendant City of Pittsburgh on February 6, 2019. (ECF No. 32.) The Motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.

On July 26, 2019, a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") was filed by the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and that Defendant City of Pittsburgh be dismissed from this action with prejudice. It further recommended that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii), the Court sua sponte dismiss with prejudice Defendants Gilmore and the State of Pennsylvania and that the remaining claim in this case be dismissed without prejudice as duplicative to claim one in Civil Action No. 17-988. (ECF No. 52.) The R&R was served on all parties with a written objections deadline for unregistered ECF users set for August 12, 2019. As of today, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, after careful de novo review of the record and consideration of the Magistrate Judge's R&R, the following order is now entered.

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2019;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 52) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of Pittsburgh (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED and they are dismissed from this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii), Defendants Gilmore and the State of Pennsylvania are sua sponte dismissed from this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining claim in this case is dismissed without prejudice because it is duplicative to claim one at Civil Action No. 17-988.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

/s/ Joy Flowers Conti

Joy Flowers Conti

Senior United States District Judge Cc: Jerome Junior Washington

HV0282

175 Progress Dr.

Waynesburg, PA 15370

Counsel of record

(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)


Summaries of

Washington v. Colgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 4, 2019
Civil Action No. 18 - 341 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Washington v. Colgan

Case Details

Full title:JERMONE JUNIOR WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. C.O. COLGAN, MR. GILMORE, CITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 4, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 18 - 341 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 4, 2019)