From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Beale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 10, 2015
Civil Action No. 3:15CV69-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:15CV69-HEH

07-10-2015

ERNEST DONALD WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. JAMES BEALE, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

On June 22, 2015, Ernest Donald Washington filed a Motion to Withdraw § 2254 Petition (ECF No. 20). Respondent filed his answer on June 5, 2015. Therefore, Washington requires leave of Court to dismiss his action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). "A [party's] motion under Rule 41(a)(2) for dismissal without prejudice should not be denied absent substantial prejudice to the defendant." Andes v. Versant Corp., 788 F.2d 1033, 1036 (4th Cir. 1986) (citing Kenrose Mfg. Co. v. Fred Whitaker Co., 512 F.2d 890, 895 (4th Cir. 1972)). Respondent fails to suggest that he will suffer substantial prejudice if Washington's Motion to Withdraw is granted. Accordingly, Washington's Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 20) will be granted. The action will be dismissed without prejudice. The outstanding motions (ECF Nos. 12, 14, 15) will be denied as moot.

An appropriate Memorandum Opinion will issue.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: July 10, 2015
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Washington v. Beale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 10, 2015
Civil Action No. 3:15CV69-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Washington v. Beale

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST DONALD WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. JAMES BEALE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jul 10, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:15CV69-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 10, 2015)