From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 23, 2018
CASE NO. CV 16-8312-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 16-8312-VAP (PJW)

03-23-2018

WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). DATED: March 23, 2018.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Washington v. Arnold

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 23, 2018
CASE NO. CV 16-8312-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Washington v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. ERIC ARNOLD, WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 23, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. CV 16-8312-VAP (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2018)