From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington Finance Corporation v. Samuels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

May, 1928.


Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. It was error to refuse to grant the defendant's request to submit the questions of fact to the jury. Defendant's motion for a direction of a verdict did not bar his receding from that motion and requesting a submission of the question of fact to the jury. ( Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 210 App. Div. 461; Scott v. Empire State Degree of Honor, 204 id. 530; Kinner v. Whipple, 198 N.Y. 585; Brown Paint Co. v. Reinhardt, 210 id. 162.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Washington Finance Corporation v. Samuels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Washington Finance Corporation v. Samuels

Case Details

Full title:WASHINGTON FINANCE CORPORATION, Respondent, v. MANHEIM S. SAMUELS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Warshow v. Title Guarantee and Trust Company

It was error to refuse to grant the request to submit the questions of fact to the jury. ( Kinner v. Whipple,…

Matter of Jacobstein

decided adversely to him and stand on his right to have a question of fact submitted to the jury if he so…