From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 15, 1964
162 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33227.

April 15, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams O'Malley, Miami, for petitioner.

Berson, Barnes, Inman, Orlando, for Maisel's Arthur Restaurant; Patrick H. Mears and Paul E. Speh, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 27, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C.J., and THORNAL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 15, 1964
162 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Washick v. Maisel's Arthur Restaurant

Case Details

Full title:ANGELINE WASHICK, PETITIONER, v. MAISEL'S ARTHUR RESTAURANT AND FLORIDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 15, 1964

Citations

162 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1964)