From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washburn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 23, 2002
805 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D01-1181

Opinion filed January 23, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. G. Robert Barron, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The appellant's motion, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), is facially insufficient to demonstrate entitlement to relief, and we therefore affirm the summary denial of this claim. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). However, this affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant's right to refile a facially sufficient motion under rule 3.800, if he is able to do so. The present denial will not stand as a bar to a successive motion raising these claims. See Tranquille v. State, 747 So.2d 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Washburn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 23, 2002
805 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Washburn v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLIFFORD H. WASHBURN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 23, 2002

Citations

805 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)