From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washburn v. Helmen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2007
2:06-cv-2890-GEB-EFB-PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2007)

Opinion

2:06-cv-2890-GEB-EFB-PS.

April 20, 2007


ORDER


On March 1, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 1, 2007, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Washburn v. Helmen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 20, 2007
2:06-cv-2890-GEB-EFB-PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2007)
Case details for

Washburn v. Helmen

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY S. WASHBURN, Plaintiff, v. JERRY HELMEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 20, 2007

Citations

2:06-cv-2890-GEB-EFB-PS (E.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2007)