From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washburn v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 17, 2021
No. 21-1692 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-1692

09-17-2021

CHOO WASHBURN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUANA QUICO CLARK, Defendant-Appellee.

Choo Washburn, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Harold Schreiber, II, LAW OFFICE OF MARTIN H. SCHREIBER II, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 14, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:20-cv-02123-TDC)

Choo Washburn, Appellant Pro Se.

Martin Harold Schreiber, II, LAW OFFICE OF MARTIN H. SCHREIBER II, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Choo Washburn appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Washburn v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 17, 2021
No. 21-1692 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Washburn v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:CHOO WASHBURN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUANA QUICO CLARK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1692 (4th Cir. Sep. 17, 2021)