From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washam v. Hartsfield

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 18, 2014
456 S.W.3d 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

WD 77260

11-18-2014

Kenneth Washam, Appellant v. Amy H. Hartsfield, et al., Respondents

Kenneth Washam, Appellant Pro-se Clinton Adams, Jr., Kansas City, for Respondents


Kenneth Washam, Appellant Pro-se

Clinton Adams, Jr., Kansas City, for Respondents

Before Division Two: Joseph M. Ellis, Presiding, Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Kenneth Washam appeals pro se from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County in favor of Respondents Amy and Wallace Hartsfield. The circuit court entered the judgment following a trial de novo on a small claims property dispute between Appellant and Respondents. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Washam v. Hartsfield

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov 18, 2014
456 S.W.3d 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Washam v. Hartsfield

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth Washam, Appellant v. Amy H. Hartsfield, et al., Respondents

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 18, 2014

Citations

456 S.W.3d 434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)