From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wash v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Jan 23, 2012
CAUSE NO.: 3:10-CV-484-TLS (N.D. Ind. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 3:10-CV-484-TLS

01-23-2012

LINDA WASH Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 27] of United States Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein, which was filed on November 17, 2011. In his Report and Recommendation, Judge Nuechterlein recommends that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed because the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) was supported by substantial evidence as the ALJ properly considered the Plaintiff's treating physician's opinions and other evidence in the record.

This Court's review of a magistrate's report and recommendation is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which provides in part:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge. The judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
The statute permits objections to the magistrate's report and recommendations to be made within fourteen days of service of a copy of the report. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) (setting forth procedures for objecting to a magistrate's report and recommendation and the district court's resolution of any objections).

As of the date of this Order, no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and the time for making objections has now passed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation prepared by Judge Nuechterlein, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 27] in its entirety and ACCEPTS the recommended disposition. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff.

_________

THERESA L. SPRINGMANN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FORT WAYNE DIVISION


Summaries of

Wash v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Jan 23, 2012
CAUSE NO.: 3:10-CV-484-TLS (N.D. Ind. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Wash v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LINDA WASH Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 3:10-CV-484-TLS (N.D. Ind. Jan. 23, 2012)