From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warwick v. Post

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 5, 1993
613 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-1210.

February 5, 1993.

Sam E. Murrell, Jr., of Law Office of Sam E. Murrell, Orlando, for appellant.

Gregory J. Kelly, of Akerman, Senterfitt Eidson, Orlando, for appellee.


Violet Warwick sued Meazzelle Post d/b/a Meazzelle Post Pools for claims connected with the construction of a pool on her property and the actions of the contractor relating to the matter. On motion, the court dismissed the cause with prejudice because the dispute had previously been resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to the construction contract.

Appellant urges, and we agree, that regardless of the merits of the prospective affirmative defense of res judicata, the motion to dismiss was an incorrect vehicle for its consideration. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.110(d) and 1.140(b).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further consideration.

GOSHORN, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.


Summaries of

Warwick v. Post

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 5, 1993
613 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Warwick v. Post

Case Details

Full title:VIOLET WARWICK, APPELLANT, v. MEAZZELLE POST D/B/A MEAZZELLE POST POOLS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 5, 1993

Citations

613 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Sanchez

Id. at 1148; see also Lucas v. Davidson, 624 So.2d 865, 866 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) ("Res judicata is an…

Mettler, Inc. v. Ellen Tracy, Inc.

Our determination must be without regard to any prospective affirmative defense. Warwick v. Post, 613 So.2d…