From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warrington v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-2693 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-2693

12-04-2012

KEITH WARRINGTON v. GERALD ROZUM, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Keith Warrington's pro se Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Reuter, to which no objections have been filed, it is ORDERED:

The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on November 8, 2012. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), a party may object to a magistrate judge's report "within fourteen (14) days after issuance of the magistrate judge's order." As of today's date, no objections have been filed.

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;

3. There are no grounds to issue a certificate of appealability; and

Petitioner has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Magistrate Judge's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong, or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003) (citations omitted).
--------

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

Juan R. Sánchez, J.


Summaries of

Warrington v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 12-2693 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Warrington v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:KEITH WARRINGTON v. GERALD ROZUM, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 4, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 12-2693 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2012)