From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Wa. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 26, 2020
Case No. 3:18-cv-1751-YY (D. Or. Aug. 26, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-cv-1751-YY

08-26-2020

DENNIS JAY WARREN, Plaintiff, v. WA. CO. SHERIFF'S OFFICE; LT. CAPRICE MASSEY; SGT. S. SIEMILLER; B. COLLINS; NAPHCARE, INC., Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [68] on July 21, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court grant defendants' motions for summary judgment [43, 46] and dismiss all claims without prejudice. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation [68]. Accordingly, Defendants' motions for summary judgment [43, 46] are GRANTED and all claims are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 26, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Warren v. Wa. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 26, 2020
Case No. 3:18-cv-1751-YY (D. Or. Aug. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Warren v. Wa. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS JAY WARREN, Plaintiff, v. WA. CO. SHERIFF'S OFFICE; LT. CAPRICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 26, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:18-cv-1751-YY (D. Or. Aug. 26, 2020)