From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Uribe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2120 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2120 MCE EFB P

02-13-2012

KENNY LYNN WARREN, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE, JR., Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 11, 2012, the assigned district judge adopted the undersigned's findings and recommendations and denied respondent's motion to dismiss. Dckt. No. 33. Petitioner then filed a motion for clarification. Dckt. No. 34.

It is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's motion for clarification is granted.

2. Within 60 days of the date of this order, respondent shall file an answer to the petition. Any response shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rules 4, 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases.

3. Petitioner's reply, if any, to respondent's answer shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of the answer.

_____________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Warren v. Uribe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2120 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Warren v. Uribe

Case Details

Full title:KENNY LYNN WARREN, Petitioner, v. DOMINGO URIBE, JR., Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2120 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2012)