From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Stein

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2019
No. 19-1615 (4th Cir. Sep. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1615

09-26-2019

TINIKA S. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSH STEIN, Attorney General; CITY OF GREENSBORO, Attorney Office; ELISE GREEN, Heir of Andrew Warren; TAKISHA WILSON, Heir of Andrew Warren; JEANETTE WARREN, Heir of Andrew Warren; ANDREW HEIRS, Heir of Andrew Warren; GUILFORD COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT, Defendants - Appellees.

Tinika S. Warren, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-01061-TDS-JLW) Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tinika S. Warren, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tinika S. Warren appeals the district court's order denying her motion for settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Warren v. Stein, No. 1:17-cv-01061 (M.D.N.C. May 10, 2019). We grant Warren's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny her motion to expedite, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Warren v. Stein

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2019
No. 19-1615 (4th Cir. Sep. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Warren v. Stein

Case Details

Full title:TINIKA S. WARREN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSH STEIN, Attorney General…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 26, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1615 (4th Cir. Sep. 26, 2019)