From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 25, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2010-156146 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2010-156146 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-240

06-25-2014

Robert A. Warren, Jr., Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Matthew Martin McGuire, of Ervin & McGuire Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Ashleigh Rayanna Wilson, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Berkeley County

Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Matthew Martin McGuire, of Ervin & McGuire Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Ashleigh Rayanna Wilson, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Robert A. Warren, Jr. challenges the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). He argues the PCR court erred by finding his trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance during closing argument. We granted his petition for a writ of certiorari, and now affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Dempsey v. State, 363 S.C. 365, 368, 610 S.E.2d 812, 814 (2005) (stating the appellate court "gives great deference to the [PCR] court's findings of fact"); Sigmon v. State, 403 S.C. 120, 128, 742 S.E.2d 394, 398 (2013) (stating the appellate court will affirm the PCR court's factual finding if any evidence supports that finding); Miller v. State, 379 S.C. 108, 115, 665 S.E.2d 596, 599 (2008) ("In a PCR proceeding, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that he is entitled to relief."); id. ("In order to prove that counsel was ineffective, the PCR applicant must show that: (1) counsel's performance was deficient; and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the trial would have been different." (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88 (1984))); Yarborough v. Gentry, 540 U.S. 1, 5-6 (2003) ("The right to effective assistance extends to closing arguments. Nonetheless, counsel has wide latitude in deciding how best to represent a client, and deference to counsel's tactical decisions in his closing presentation is particularly important because of the broad range of legitimate defense strategy at that stage." (internal citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and SHORT and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Warren v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 25, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2010-156146 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 25, 2014)
Case details for

Warren v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert A. Warren, Jr., Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 25, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2010-156146 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 25, 2014)