From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 27, 2000
246 Ga. App. 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

A00A2513.

NOVEMBER 27, 2000

Motion to correct sentence. Gwinnett Superior Court. Before Judge Jackson.

Ronald Warren, pro se. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, R. Keith Miles, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Ronald Warren appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to correct and clarify the sentence he received as a result of his guilty plea to four counts of forgery and one count of theft by deception. Warren moved the trial court to correct his sentence to reflect credit for time he served incarcerated prior to the imposition of the present sentence. For the reasons set forth below, the trial court's denial of Warren's motion is affirmed.

Although Warren is correct that pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-10-11 (a) he should be given credit for time spent in confinement awaiting trial, "the amount of credit is to be computed by the convict's pre-sentence custodian, and the duty to award the credit for time served prior to trial is upon the Department of [Corrections]. O.C.G.A. § 17-10-12." Casario v. State.

Casario v. State, 169 Ga. App. 515 ( 313 S.E.2d 772) (1984).

The trial court directed that Warren's sentence be "computed as provided by law." According to O.C.G.A. § 17-10-12 andCasario, supra, the trial court's order is not erroneous or ambiguous. "It follows that the trial court did not err in refusing to modify its sentence as requested, the responsibility for computing credit for time served awaiting trial not being upon the trial court." Id. See also Spann v. Whitworth (demonstrating the appropriate procedure to correct errors such as that alleged in the present case). Warren should have sought relief from the Department of Corrections. Upon denial of such relief, Warren could have sought relief in the superior court as provided by law. Id.

Spann v. Whitworth, 262 Ga. 21 ( 413 S.E.2d 713) (1992).

In the present case, Warren's complaint is properly addressed to his pre-sentence custodian and/or the Department of Corrections.

Judgment affirmed. Eldridge and Barnes, JJ., concur.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 27, 2000.


Summaries of

Warren v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 27, 2000
246 Ga. App. 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Warren v. State

Case Details

Full title:WARREN v. THE STATE. BL-100C

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 27, 2000

Citations

246 Ga. App. 894 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000)
543 S.E.2d 38

Citing Cases

Cutter v. State

" Maldonado v. State. See, e.g., Bryant v. Evans (appeal from mandamus action against Commissioner of…

Woody v. Spires

The GDOC has a duty to award credit for time served prior to trial." Kelley v. Ga. Dep't of Corr., 145 F.…