From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 4, 1978
244 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

55275.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 1, 1978.

DECIDED APRIL 4, 1978.

Kidnapping, etc. Baldwin Superior Court. Before Judge Duke.

Robert H. Green, Hugh P. Thompson, for appellant.

Joseph H. Briley, District Attorney, for appellee.


Warren appeals from his convictions of rape and kidnapping. Enumerations of error one through four deal with the general grounds and the charge given, and they are meritless. The remaining nine enumerations of error deal with the court's refusal to give certain requested charges. In his brief, as "support" for each of those nine enumerations of error, appellant merely sets out the particular requested charge and then states: "The charge was correct in statement of the law, as adjusted to the facts in the case, and the court's failure to charge same was error and prejudicial to appellant." This amounts to a mere restatement of each enumeration, and we deem each of the nine enumerations of error to have been abandoned for lack of argument in the brief. Rule 18 (c) (2) of Court of Appeals (Code Ann. § 24-3618); Weaver v. State, 137 Ga. App. 470 ( 224 S.E.2d 110) (1976).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.


SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 1, 1978 — DECIDED APRIL 4, 1978.


Summaries of

Warren v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 4, 1978
244 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Warren v. State

Case Details

Full title:WARREN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 4, 1978

Citations

244 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
244 S.E.2d 103

Citing Cases

Morris v. State

1. "Any enumerated error which is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument shall be…