From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 30, 2008
980 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D08-535.

April 30, 2008.

Appeal of orders denying rule 3.800(a) motions from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael G. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 95-17947 CF10B.

Blake E. Warren, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Prior report: 724 So.2d 607.


Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a Rule 3.800(a) motion which alleges where in the record (the court file, jail records or other location) the information regarding jail time can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to that relief. See Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Alternatively, if appropriate, Appellant may file a sworn and timely Rule 3.850 motion, challenging his sentence for failure to award jail time credit. See Alfonso v. State, 901 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Appellant's attachment of the computer court docket to his motion for rehearing did not satisfy Toro.

In considering a renewed motion, the trial court should also consider appellant's jail records. See Wallace v. State, 789 So.2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Warren v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 30, 2008
980 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Warren v. State

Case Details

Full title:Blake E. WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 30, 2008

Citations

980 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Thompkins v. State

This court's affirmance of the claim is without prejudice to Thompkins filing a legally sufficient rule…

Rambeau v. State

The order denying appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed without prejudice for appellant to file a new…