From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. McGowan

Supreme Court of California
Jul 28, 1904
7 Cal. Unrep. 190 (Cal. 1904)

Opinion

          In Bank. Appeal from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; Thomas F. Graham, Judge.

         Action by F. M. Warren against James P. McGowan. From an order setting aside a judgment for plaintiff, he appeals. Dismissed.

          COUNSEL

          Rigby & Rigby and Wal. J. Tuska, for appellant.

          Eugene D. Sullivan and Thomas P. Boyd, for respondent.


          OPINION

          PER CURIAM.

          This is a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from an order made by the superior court vacating and setting aside a judgment that had been rendered in favor of plaintiff. From the affidavits and the certificate [7 Cal.Unrep. 191] of the clerk it appears that the appeal was perfected on the 3d day of December, 1903, and that the bill of exceptions to be used on said appeal was settled by the judge who made the order on the 11th day of December, 1903, and on the same day filed in the office of said clerk. It further appears from the certificate of the clerk that said clerk has never been requested to certify to the correctness of any transcript on appeal, and no such transcript has been filed in this court. It further appears that no extension of time to file such transcript has been granted.

          It is ordered that the appeal be dismissed.


Summaries of

Warren v. McGowan

Supreme Court of California
Jul 28, 1904
7 Cal. Unrep. 190 (Cal. 1904)
Case details for

Warren v. McGowan

Case Details

Full title:WARREN v. McGOWAN.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 28, 1904

Citations

7 Cal. Unrep. 190 (Cal. 1904)
7 Cal. Unrep. 190

Citing Cases

Brown v. Cobb

Rule VI (176 Pac. ix) provides, among other things, that "it shall be incumbent on the party moving to…