From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. McDonough

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 12, 2006
Case No. SC06-1089 (Fla. Jun. 12, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. SC06-1089.

June 12, 2006.


Petitioner's "Notice to the Clerk, Fraud Factor" has been treated as a petition for writ of mandamus, and because petitioner has failed to show that he has a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied.See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Warren v. McDonough

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 12, 2006
Case No. SC06-1089 (Fla. Jun. 12, 2006)
Case details for

Warren v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SCOTT WARREN, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, ETC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 12, 2006

Citations

Case No. SC06-1089 (Fla. Jun. 12, 2006)