From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Lindsey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 21, 2015
3:13-cv-00333-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2015)

Opinion

3:13-cv-00333-RCJ-VCF

04-21-2015

STEPHEN WARREN, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN EUGENE LINDSEY et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This case arises out of an allegedly false report of theft. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) (ECF No. 126). That motion, like the previous objection to the Bill of Costs has been rendered moot by the relevant parties' stipulation to dismiss after the Court granted summary judgment to the relevant Defendants.

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) (ECF No. 126) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 21 st day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Warren v. Lindsey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 21, 2015
3:13-cv-00333-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Warren v. Lindsey

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN WARREN, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN EUGENE LINDSEY et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 21, 2015

Citations

3:13-cv-00333-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2015)