Opinion
8:21-cv-66-AAS
10-26-2022
ORDER
AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Jacqueline Warren moves for attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. Section 2412. (Doc. 23). The Commissioner does not oppose the motion. (Id. at 2).
Ms. Warren requests $5,595.62 in attorney's fees. (Id. at 7). The EAJA permits awards for reasonable attorney's fees and costs to a prevailing party against the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 2412. An August 19, 2022 order remanded the Commissioner's final decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. 21). The Clerk entered judgment in Ms. Warren's favor. (Doc. 22).
The Commissioner does not contest the following: Ms. Warren is the prevailing party; Ms. Warren's net worth was less than $2 million when she filed her complaint; the Commissioner's position was not substantially justified; and Ms. Warren's attorney's fees request are reasonable. (Doc. 23, pp. 3-7). A court should grant a Social Security claimant's request for attorney's fees when it is unopposed. See Jones v. Colvin, No. 8:13-CV-2900-T-33AEP, 2015 WL 7721334 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 30, 2015) (awarding unopposed attorney's fees request). Thus, Ms. Warren is entitled to $5,595.62 in attorney's fees.
Attorney's fees awarded to a claimant under the EAJA can be offset to satisfy the claimant's pre-existing debt to the United States. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010). Following an order, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Mr. Smith owes a debt to the United States. Ms. Warren assigned her rights to EAJA fees to her attorney. (Doc. 22, Ex. 1). So, if Ms. Warren has no federal debt, the United States will accept her assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to counsel.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Ms. Warren motion for attorney's fees under the EAJA (Doc. 23) be GRANTED. Ms. Warren is awarded $5,595.62 in attorney's fees.
ORDERED.