From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. High

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jul 1, 1810
5 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1810)

Opinion

July Term, 1810.

The probate of a will attested by only one witness being caveated in the County Court, an issue of devisavit vel non was made up under the direction of the court; and the jury found that "the deceased did, in the said will, devise both real and personal property." The caveator appealed, and in the Superior Court the jury found that "the paper-writing offered as the will did devise as to personals, but not as to real estate." The executor offering the will for probate shall pay the costs, it being his folly to insist in the County Court that the will, being attested by only one witness, could pass the real estate.

A PAPER-WRITING, purporting to be the last will of William Martin, deceased, was offered for probate in Wake County Court, and a caveat was entered to the probate thereof. An issue of devisavit vel non was made up under the direction of the court. The paper-writing was attested by only one witness, and the jury returned for their verdict, "that the deceased did devise both real and personal property, in the paper-writing offered in evidence as the last will and testament of the said William Martin." The defendant, the caveator, appealed to the Superior Court, in which court, the issue being submitted to a jury, they found, "that the paper-writing purporting to be the last will and testament of William Martin, deceased, doth devise as to personals, but not as to real estate." A (437) question was then made who should pay the costs. Which question being sent to this Court,


From Wake.


It appears that the only real question here decided was as to the real property, under the issue of devisavit vel non. In the County Court a verdict was found for the plaintiff, although there was only one subscribing witness to the will. The defendant very properly appealed, and a verdict was found in favor of him in the Superior Court. As our law requires at least two subscribing witnesses to a will of land, and as it was supposed by those who had an agency in deciding this question in the County Court, that that requisite might be dispensed with, the defendant was necessarily driven to his appeal; and of course, the plaintiff ought to pay the costs.


Summaries of

Warren v. High

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jul 1, 1810
5 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1810)
Case details for

Warren v. High

Case Details

Full title:HENRY WARREN v. ALSEY HIGH

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jul 1, 1810

Citations

5 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1810)