From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Corcoran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 17, 2011
9:09-CV-1146 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

9:09-CV-1146

11-17-2011

EVAN WARREN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CORCORAN; SUE LENNOX; J. BIGGAR; L. JOHNSON; D. CRULL; C. BURGIN; and J. KEISER, Defendants.

EVAN WARREN, 06-B-2142 Plaintiff, pro se HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendant OF COUNSEL: C. HARRIS DAGUE, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES:

EVAN WARREN, 06-B-2142

Plaintiff, pro se

HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN

Attorney General for the State of New York

Attorney for Defendant

OF COUNSEL:

C. HARRIS DAGUE, ESQ.

Ass't Attorney General

DAVID N. HURD

United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 20, 2011, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the complaint dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 17, 2011

Utica, New York.

__________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Warren v. Corcoran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 17, 2011
9:09-CV-1146 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Warren v. Corcoran

Case Details

Full title:EVAN WARREN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CORCORAN; SUE LENNOX; J. BIGGAR; L…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

9:09-CV-1146 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2011)