From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:07-cv-01285-LJO-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-01285-LJO-TAG (HC).

May 13, 2008


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER and DENYING RESPONDENT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Docs. 12, 13)


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 10, 2008, Respondent filed a motion for a 30-day extension of time to file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 12). On May 13, 2008, Petitioner filed a second motion for a 10-day extension of time to file an answer. (Doc. 13).

Good cause having been presented to the Court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent's first motion for an extension of time (Doc. 12), is GRANTED;

2. Respondent shall have to and including May 28, 2008 to file an answer; and

3. Respondent's second motion for an extension of time (Doc. 13) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Warren v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:07-cv-01285-LJO-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Warren v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE WARREN, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-01285-LJO-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)