From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warnken v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2010
No. CIV. S-08-2891 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV. S-08-2891 LKK EFB PS.

February 24, 2010


ORDER


On December 8, 2009, Magistrate Judge Brennan issued Findings and Recommendations that this court grant defendants' motions to dismiss without leave to amend. On December 23, 2009, plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the Findings and Recommendations to which objection is made and of all conclusions of law.

On January 19, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for oral argument concerning this de novo review of the Findings and Recommendations. The court does not find oral argument necessary in this matter. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for oral argument is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Warnken v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2010
No. CIV. S-08-2891 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Warnken v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL C. WARNKEN and ALL CALIFORNIANS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2010

Citations

No. CIV. S-08-2891 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2010)