From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warnick v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Oct 26, 2018
No. 453, 2018 (Del. Oct. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 453, 2018

10-26-2018

DARRYL L. WARNICK, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.


Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware Cr. ID No. 1203011242 (K) Before VALIHURA, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices. ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the appellee's motion to affirm, and the record below, we conclude that the August 20, 2018 Superior Court order denying the appellant's second motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 should be affirmed. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that the motion was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 61(d)(2).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J . Seitz, Jr.

Justice


Summaries of

Warnick v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Oct 26, 2018
No. 453, 2018 (Del. Oct. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Warnick v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL L. WARNICK, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Oct 26, 2018

Citations

No. 453, 2018 (Del. Oct. 26, 2018)