From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warner v. Ramos

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 3, 2023
No. 23-6350 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2023)

Opinion

23-6350

10-03-2023

LUKE JOSEPH WARNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN RAMOS; FMC DEVENS; FBOP-DSCC; FBOP; U.S. DOJ; USDC-HI; USCA9; USDC-MA; USCA1, Respondents-Appellees.

Luke Joseph Warner, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 28, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-hc-02100-D)

Luke Joseph Warner, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Luke Joseph Warner, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the execution of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Warner v. Ramos, No. 5:22-hc-02100-D (E.D. N.C. Sept. 23, 2022 &Mar. 21, 2023). We deny Warner's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Warner v. Ramos

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 3, 2023
No. 23-6350 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Warner v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:LUKE JOSEPH WARNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN RAMOS; FMC DEVENS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

Citations

No. 23-6350 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2023)