From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warner v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1906
115 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

October, 1906.


This order for the taking of deposition of a person not a party cannot stand, for it was granted at Special Term instead of by a judge; the affidavits presented were insufficient in material matters, and the order itself is indefinite, if not defective. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with ten dollars costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Warner v. Holmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1906
115 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Warner v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:Ellen E. Warner, Respondent, v. Franklin S. Holmes, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1906

Citations

115 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)