From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warner v. Holman

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1864
24 Cal. 228 (Cal. 1864)

Opinion

         Rehearing Denied 24 Cal. 228 at 230.

         Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Solano County.

         COUNSEL:

         Whitman & Wells, for Appellant.

          John Currey, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Crocker, J.

         OPINION

          CROCKER, Judge

         On petition for rehearing.

         Shafter, J.

         The petition for a rehearing in this cause upon the merits must be denied; but, inasmuch as we have serious doubts as to the correctness of the judgment dismissing the appeal on the ground of alleged defects in the notice, that judgment is vacated, and instead thereof, a judgment affirming the judgment of the District Court is directed.

         Petition denied and judgment affirmed.

         [The above case was decided at the October term, 1863, by the late Supreme Court, but a rehearing was asked, which was denied by the present Court.--Reporter.]


Summaries of

Warner v. Holman

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1864
24 Cal. 228 (Cal. 1864)
Case details for

Warner v. Holman

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. WARNER v. D. B. HOLMAN

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1864

Citations

24 Cal. 228 (Cal. 1864)

Citing Cases

People v. Schmitz

The order of service and filing of the notice of appeal on the same day is immaterial, the law disregarding…

Wright v. Ross

The record indicates the proper order of proceedings, and it is at least doubtful whether affidavits could be…