Opinion
No. 74-2303.
February 27, 1976.
Henry L. Klein, New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Lamar Richardson, Jr., Metairie, La., for John Suitt.
Richard A. Dowling, Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Bueker F. Amann, Asst. City Atty., New Orleans, La., for Police Pension.
William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., Philip D. Lorio, III, Asst. City Atty., New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
This appeal presents the same jurisdictional issues as are involved in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, today decided.
The trial court's order dismissing the complaint for want of § 1983 jurisdiction was proper for the reasons stated by us in Muzquiz.
Affirmed.
I dissent in part and concur in part as set forth in my opinion in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, decided this day.
I dissent from the decision in this case on the grounds stated by me in the dissent in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, et al., 5 Cir. 1976, 528 F.2d 499, announced this day.
I concur in part and dissent in part in accordance with the views set forth in my partial concurrence and partial dissent in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 528 F.2d 499 (5 Cir. 1976), decided this day.
I dissent in part and concur in part as set forth in my opinion in Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 528 F.2d 499 [No. 74-3177] (CA 5, 1976), decided this day.