From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warmkessel v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-3376 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-3376.

April 9, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2009, after careful review and independent consideration of the Plaintiff's brief and request for review, Defendant's response, Plaintiff's response, and review of the Report and Recommendation of Carol Sandra Moore Wells, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation be APPROVED and ADOPTED;
(2) The Plaintiff's Request for Review be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and
(3) The matter be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security Administration to allow the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to conduct additional proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. On remand, the ALJ shall: (1) elicit testimony regarding Mr. Warmkessel's ability to walk and, thereafter, re-evaluate whether he medically equaled Listing 1.02A, (2) re-assess Mr. Warmkessel's RFC considering all of his physical impairments, (3) clearly articulate the specific limitations his physical impairments caused, (4) re-assess Mr. Warmkessel's and Ms. Fluck's credibility, and (5) pose hypothetical questions to the vocational expert which take into account all credible limitations.

It be so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Warmkessel v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-3376 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Warmkessel v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ELEANORE E. WARMKESSEL o/b/o DONALD C. WARMKESSEL, III Plaintiff v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 9, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-3376 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2009)