From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warmann v. Ebeling

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 1, 1981
625 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981)

Summary

holding that the plaintiff's appeal must be dismissed because the plaintiff sued three defendants for fraud and the trial court only granted summary judgment for two of the defendants, remaining silent as to the third defendant, thus, the judgment rendered by the trial court did not dispose of all the parties

Summary of this case from First Cmty. Credit Union v. Levison

Opinion

No. 44071.

December 1, 1981.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MILTON A. SAITZ, J.

Alan G. Kimbrell, St. Louis, for appellants.

Albert M. Schlueter, Lamar E. Ottsen, Jr., Clayton, for respondents.


Plaintiffs Warmann and Mitchell sued defendants Ebeling, Meier and Mars. They alleged fraud in the sale of grain elevators. Defendants Meier and Mars moved for summary judgment and plaintiffs have appealed from the trial court's order granting that motion.

Preliminarily we note that the judgment appealed from is silent as to defendant Ebeling. Here, defendants Meier and Mars squarely challenge the judgment's appealability since it did not dispose of plaintiffs' claim against defendant Ebeling. In neither plaintiffs' brief nor their reply brief do they refer to the challenge of nonfinality of the judgment from which they are attempting to appeal.

To be appealable a judgment must have disposed of "all issues and all parties". Hill v. Boles, 583 S.W.2d 141[4-6] (Mo.banc 1979). This is required to avoid "piecemeal presentation of cases on appeal". Bolin v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co., 549 S.W.2d 866[2, 3] (Mo.banc 1977). To the same effect see MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Home Mutual Insurance Co., 600 S.W.2d 521 (Mo.App. 1980), holding it is settled law that a judgment is final and appealable only when it disposes of all parties. Citing that case, it was held in Haarmann v. Davis, 620 S.W.2d 39 (Mo.App. 1981), that a judgment is not appealable when it does not dispose of all parties.

It follows that plaintiffs are attempting to appeal from an unappealable judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

REINHARD, P. J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Warmann v. Ebeling

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 1, 1981
625 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981)

holding that the plaintiff's appeal must be dismissed because the plaintiff sued three defendants for fraud and the trial court only granted summary judgment for two of the defendants, remaining silent as to the third defendant, thus, the judgment rendered by the trial court did not dispose of all the parties

Summary of this case from First Cmty. Credit Union v. Levison

holding that the plaintiff's appeal must be dismissed because the plaintiff sued three defendants for fraud and the trial court only granted summary judgment for two of the defendants, remaining silent as to the third defendant, thus, the judgment rendered by the trial court did not dispose of all the parties

Summary of this case from First Cmty. Credit Union v. Levison

In Warmann, the plaintiff sued three defendants for fraud. The trial court granted summary judgment for two of the defendants; however, the record was silent concerning the third.

Summary of this case from Willman v. Walker
Case details for

Warmann v. Ebeling

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD C. WARMANN AND JEANETTE RAND MITCHELL, APPELLANTS, v. MORRIS K…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Dec 1, 1981

Citations

625 S.W.2d 691 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Willman v. Walker

(an order may be designated final for purposes of appeal under Rule 81.06 even where all parties and issues…

Warmann v. Ebeling

On December 1, 1981, this court dismissed plaintiffs' appeal for lack of a final judgment disposing of their…