From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warith v. Hull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Sep 5, 2017
No. 1:17-CV-3054-SMJ (E.D. Wash. Sep. 5, 2017)

Summary

In Sheriff v. Hull, 37 Iowa 174, 176, an action for breach of covenants of warranty in a deed by failure to pay taxes, we held that the defendant having made a tender, which the plaintiff did not reject, there could be no recovery for interest and costs, even though the tender was for an insufficient amount.

Summary of this case from Watson v. Chapman

Opinion

No. 1:17-CV-3054-SMJ

09-05-2017

DEVON ABDULLAH WARITH, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF HULL, YAKIMA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE ERIC HORBATKO, JAME P. HAGARTY and YAKIMA COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OFFICE Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Rodgers' July 25, 2017 Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 11, recommending that the Court dismiss without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff did not file an objection.

After reviewing the Report and Recommendation and relevant authorities, the Court finds that Magistrate Rodger's findings are correct. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 11, is ADOPTED in its entirety.

2. Mr. Warith's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and would lack any arguable basis in law or fact.

4. The Clerk's Office shall ENTER JUDGMENT consistent with this order and CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to all counsel and Magistrate Judge Rodgers.

DATED this 5th day of September 2017.

/s/_________

SALVADOR MENDOZA, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Warith v. Hull

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Sep 5, 2017
No. 1:17-CV-3054-SMJ (E.D. Wash. Sep. 5, 2017)

In Sheriff v. Hull, 37 Iowa 174, 176, an action for breach of covenants of warranty in a deed by failure to pay taxes, we held that the defendant having made a tender, which the plaintiff did not reject, there could be no recovery for interest and costs, even though the tender was for an insufficient amount.

Summary of this case from Watson v. Chapman
Case details for

Warith v. Hull

Case Details

Full title:DEVON ABDULLAH WARITH, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF HULL, YAKIMA COUNTY SHERIFFS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Sep 5, 2017

Citations

No. 1:17-CV-3054-SMJ (E.D. Wash. Sep. 5, 2017)

Citing Cases

Watson v. Chapman

To the same effect is Conde v. Dreisam Gold Min. Mill. Co., 3 Cal.App. 583, 86 P. 825. In Sheriff v. Hull, 37…