From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waring v. Greater Portland Pub. Dev't. Com'n

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 18, 1986
510 A.2d 1068 (Me. 1986)

Opinion

Argued June 10, 1986.

Decided June 18, 1986.

Appeal from the Superior Court Cumberland County.

Lowry Platt, Donald G. Lowry (orally), Portland, for plaintiff.

Hewes, Douglas, Whiting Quinn, Samuel Rudman (orally), Portland, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, and SCOLNIK, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The defendant, Greater Portland Public Development Commission [GPPDC], appeals from the denial of its motion to set aside an entry of default and the resulting default judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) entered in favor of the plaintiff, Robert W. Waring. On appeal GPPDC challenges the denial of its motion to set aside entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(c) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the record does not demonstrate either a good excuse for the failure to answer prior to entry of default or a meritorious defense to the action, we affirm the judgment. See Michaud v. Mutual Fire, Marine Inland Ins. Co., 505 A.2d 786, 790-91 (Me. 1986).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

Waring v. Greater Portland Pub. Dev't. Com'n

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 18, 1986
510 A.2d 1068 (Me. 1986)
Case details for

Waring v. Greater Portland Pub. Dev't. Com'n

Case Details

Full title:Robert W. WARING v. GREATER PORTLAND PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Jun 18, 1986

Citations

510 A.2d 1068 (Me. 1986)

Citing Cases

Burns v. Westfield Inn

By finding a good excuse for the failure to answer prior to entry of default and a meritorious defense to the…