From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 3, 2013
109 So. 3d 895 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 1D12–1455.

2013-04-3

Franklin Dillion WARFIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge. Ronald W. Johnson of Ronald W. Johnson, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. J. Scott Duncan, Judge.
Ronald W. Johnson of Ronald W. Johnson, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel A. Perrone, Assistant Attorney General, Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Brunson, 369 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla.1979) (“We specifically hold that a felon under eighteen years of age who is sentenced to probation, but who subsequently violates that probation in a manner which justifies its revocation, may be sentenced without benefit of a presentence investigation. We further hold that once a juvenile felon has demonstrated his inability to comply with the conditions of his probation and has consequently had it revoked, a presentence investigation is not required before sentencing on any subsequent felonies he may commit.”).

BENTON, C.J., WOLF, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Warfield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 3, 2013
109 So. 3d 895 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Warfield v. State

Case Details

Full title:Franklin Dillion WARFIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

109 So. 3d 895 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)