From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wareham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 30, 1996
678 So. 2d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Nos. 96-1608, 96-1828.

August 2, 1996. Rehearing Denied August 30, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County; Richard O. Watson, Judge.

Francis X. Wareham, Polk City, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


In these two cases, which we consolidate and consider together, defendant appeals the summary denial of his third and his fourth Rule 3.800 (a) motions to correct sentences he received for burglary, after violation of probation, and for manslaughter.

It is denominated a "supplement."

The trial court correctly ruled that these motions are frivolous and constitute an abuse of the court's process. There is no need to indulge such filings until their number approaches a dozen. Accordingly, we order that appellant shall not be permitted to file any further pro se attacks upon his 1989 judgment and sentences.

AFFIRMED with directions.

GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wareham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 30, 1996
678 So. 2d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Wareham v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS X. WAREHAM, APPELLANT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 30, 1996

Citations

678 So. 2d 432 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Spencer v. State

Such a sanction can be imposed at the trial level as well as the appellate level. See Bivens v. State, 23…

Smith v. State

Because appellant has engaged in frivolous and successive appeals we warn him that if he files another appeal…