From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ware v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Feb 25, 2020
593 S.W.3d 694 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107406

02-25-2020

Stanley WARE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Jessica Hathaway, 120 South Central Avenue, Ste. 130, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant. Eric Schmitt, Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Jessica Hathaway, 120 South Central Avenue, Ste. 130, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Eric Schmitt, Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, P.J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Robin Ransom, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Ware, Jr., appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion under Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 (2019) for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2019).


Summaries of

Ware v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Feb 25, 2020
593 S.W.3d 694 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Ware v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stanley WARE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Feb 25, 2020

Citations

593 S.W.3d 694 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)