From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ware v. Schoone

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 29, 1996
199 Wis. 2d 712 (Wis. 1996)

Opinion

No. 93-2873

Oral argument February 27, 1996

Decided March 29, 1996

REVIEW of a decision of the court of appeals. Affirmed.

For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by L. William Staudenmaier, Alexander T. Pendleton and Cook Franke, S.C., Milwaukee and oral argument by L. William Staudenmaier.

For the defendants-respondents there was a brief by Thomas M. Devine, David A. Wolfe and Hostak, Henzl Bichler, S.C., Racine and oral argument by Thomas M. Devine.


(Affirming 191 Wis.2d 359 (table), 530 N.W.2d 69 (Ct.App. 1995).)


The court is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Chief Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice JON P. WILCOX, and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice JANINE P. GESKE being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.


Summaries of

Ware v. Schoone

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Mar 29, 1996
199 Wis. 2d 712 (Wis. 1996)
Case details for

Ware v. Schoone

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL M. WARE, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. ADRIAN P. SCHOONE…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Mar 29, 1996

Citations

199 Wis. 2d 712 (Wis. 1996)
546 N.W.2d 142

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kleynerman

State v. Elam , 195 Wis.2d 683, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (on bypass).68. Ware v. Schoone , 199 Wis.2d 712, 546…

Johnson v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.

Defendants contend that plaintiffs have failed to allege a key component of a declaratory judgment action:…