From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ware v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-cv-1844 (W.D. La. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-cv-1844

01-24-2012

JAMIE RAY WARE LA. DOC #454293 v. BURL CAIN, WARDEN


JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES


JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

THUS DONE AND SIGNED this ____ day of ___________, 2012, in Shreveport, Louisiana.

______________________

DONALD E. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ware v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Jan 24, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-cv-1844 (W.D. La. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Ware v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE RAY WARE LA. DOC #454293 v. BURL CAIN, WARDEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-cv-1844 (W.D. La. Jan. 24, 2012)